Officer reviewing documents as applicant holds passports
Canada’s immigration system stands at a crossroads as Parliament moves ahead with Bill C-12, a law the government calls a long-overdue upgrade to a system struggling with high demand. Supporters frame it as a practical fix for a country facing historic migration pressures. Critics see something far more significant — a sharp turn toward tougher border control that could signal the most sweeping expansion of enforcement powers in decades.
What makes the debate so charged is the data behind it. Canada is receiving more asylum claims than ever. Irregular crossings have dropped but not due to falling demand. Temporary resident numbers continue to rise. These pressures form the backdrop for a bill that could touch every part of Canadian immigration — from refugee shelters to university classrooms, and from busy airports to seasonal farms in rural towns.
Canada processed over 144,000 asylum claims in 2023, marking a 56% increase in only one year. This surge places enormous weight on the Immigration and Refugee Board, which already faces long backlogs and limited resources.
Irregular border crossings, meanwhile, dropped significantly — from roughly 40,000 in 2022 to around 17,000 in 2023. This decline followed the expanded Safe Third Country Agreement, which closed the loophole that previously allowed people to enter through unofficial border paths like Roxham Road. But the lower irregular numbers did not reduce overall demand. Instead, claimants redirected to regular ports of entry such as airports and official land crossings.
Canada also accepted 74,979 people as refugees or protected persons through permanent residence in 2023 — a small 1% increase. In addition, 51,081 resettled refugees arrived from overseas programs. These figures confirm Canada’s commitment to humanitarian resettlement but also reflect the limits of processing capacity at a time when demand keeps rising.
Taken together, the data shows a system stretched to its edge: more asylum seekers arriving through formal routes, higher needs than available pathways, and ongoing delays even as irregular crossings fall.
This environment sets the stage for Bill C-12 — a bill some experts say pulls Canada toward a more restrictive model similar to approaches used in other Western nations.
Bill C-12 brings a wide mix of new powers that stretch across screening, enforcement, and application control. The government says these tools will help manage rising pressures at the border. The bill introduces several major changes that work together to tighten oversight across multiple stages of the immigration process.
One of the biggest shifts is the government’s new ability to stop or freeze visa and permit applications. Officers would decide when applications need extra scrutiny or when they should be halted altogether. Officials argue this helps them respond quickly to fraud or high-risk patterns.
The Canada Border Services Agency would also receive sharper authority to inspect and hold shipments linked to possible immigration offences. This measure aims to give front-line officers more room to act when they suspect organized activity or irregular movements of goods and documents.
Another major change comes from expanded information-sharing. Border officers, immigration officials, and security agencies would exchange more data, creating a tighter network for screening files and identifying problems earlier in the process. Supporters say this speed could help them respond to surges more efficiently.
Bill C-12 also equips authorities with new tools to dig into extensive fraud schemes and trafficking networks. These investigations could target groups that exploit students, workers, and visitors, as well as organizations that profit from misleading newcomers.
A separate part of the bill gives the government flexibility during exceptional situations. In these moments, officers could move some groups through the system faster or place temporary limits on certain applicants. Critics worry this power may be used too broadly without strong safeguards.
Those who support the bill believe it offers the structure needed to keep the system functioning at a time of record asylum claims and heavy temporary-resident demand. Opponents warn it hands the government wide control over who enters the country and how long decisions take, with fewer protections for people who need access to the system.
Bill C-12 could influence a wide range of newcomers, but its effects will not be felt evenly. Some groups may encounter these changes far earlier than others, depending on their pathways and vulnerabilities.
International students form one of Canada’s largest newcomer communities, with over 900,000 enrolled across the country. Under Bill C-12, they may see tougher checks at the visa stage. Officers could use enhanced tools to verify documents, look more closely at recruitment networks, and cancel applications more readily.
Students from regions linked to frequent fraud cases may face slower processing or more refusals. Colleges and universities worry that unpredictable outcomes could hurt future enrollment and strain their budgets.
People applying for visitor visas may also notice changes early on. Refusal rates in some countries already exceed 50%, and the bill’s expanded data-matching powers could raise that number. Families hoping to travel for weddings, caregiving, or emergencies may encounter heavier document reviews and longer waits before receiving a decision.
Many Canadian industries depend on foreign workers to fill essential roles, from farms and long-term care facilities to restaurants and hospitals. Bill C-12 may slow the process if applications are flagged for deeper fraud checks. Employers could face stricter inspections, and applications already in progress may be paused while reviews take place.
Worker advocates warn that these rules may discourage people from reporting unsafe jobs or exploitation, since a paused file could place their status at risk.
LGBTQIA+ applicants may face unique difficulties under the bill’s new screening tools. Some individuals lack traditional documents because of discrimination in their home countries. Faster prescreening or cancellation powers could overlook the realities of gender-based or sexuality-based persecution.
If decisions are delayed or applicants are held for extended reviews, people fleeing criminalization or targeted violence may face increased danger.
Canada processed more than 144,000 asylum claims last year. In a system already stretched, even small administrative changes can affect thousands. Bill C-12 could introduce tighter prescreening, broader ineligibility rules, quicker refusals, and slower progress when large reviews take place.
For people escaping persecution, political repression, or violence, any disruption in the process can deepen uncertainty. Experts warn that access to the Immigration and Refugee Board could narrow even if Canada’s broader refugee policies remain unchanged.
Canada has long presented itself as a global leader in refugee protection. Critics argue that Bill C-12 challenges this identity by shifting the system toward greater control and less accessible pathways.
Some call it the most significant restriction since the post-9/11 era, pointing to three main concerns:
For many experts, the bill reflects a shift from a humanitarian model to a security-driven one.
Immigration now drives almost all of Canada’s labour-force growth. With an aging population and low birth rates, the country relies heavily on newcomers to maintain its workforce, support public services, and keep industries running.
Bill C-12 introduces new risks:
Economists warn that restrictive or unpredictable implementation may affect everything from food supply chains to health-care staffing.
Canada’s immigration system is experiencing historic pressures: record asylum numbers, a surge in temporary residents, backlogs across multiple streams, and falling trust in existing processes. Bill C-12 attempts to address these challenges but may also shift Canada’s direction on immigration more profoundly than any major policy change in recent memory.
For refugees, students, workers, families, and LGBTQIA+ migrants, the stakes are immediate and personal.
For Canada’s economy, the consequences could shape future growth.
For the country’s immigration identity, the bill marks a moment of reflection — and possibly a turning point.
Whether Bill C-12 becomes a tool for managing a strained system or a doorway to a more restrictive era will depend on how its powers are used. Many warn that this law could be remembered not only for its intentions but for its long-lasting impact on the people it reaches first.
Having an 'Identity Verified' badge or being 'Identity Verified' simply indicates that an individual has submitted information to complete our identity verification process or we have conducted internal verification using various authorized websites. While this process includes safeguards, it does not guarantee that the person is who they claim to be.
If you encounter any issues with this profile, please report them here. While all consultants who are verified have RCIC ID, we may not have the latest data in terms of their renewal/cancellation/discontinuation of their RCIC ID.
The "Verified Consultants" profiles are created using publicly available information, including data from the IRCC website, official consultant sites, other listing platforms, and social media. Immiperts.com is an independent platform, not affiliated with IRCC or any registered immigration consultants. To update, claim, or remove your profile, please contact us at [email protected].
╳